In March 2020, millions of learners were taken out of classrooms by schools and universities. Educators used video conferencing and shared documents. Many educators replicated what was done in the classroom and did not change the curriculum. The learners experienced poor internet connectivity, crowded learning environments, long video conference sessions, and a lack of support.
This is one of the biggest problems for educators in digital learning. The course teams modified the platform, made lessons shorter, created more flexible schedules, and improved the structure. Employers gave comprehensive training. Universities offered hybrid courses and minimized credential programs. Educators utilized artificial intelligence for feedback and tutoring. Course developers utilized AI to make their work easier.
There are more options for learners in 2026 than in 2020. Disparities in access and teaching quality persist among learners. Online education is used to pursue formal courses and build career skills.
Emergency Remote Learning in 2020
Universities closed, which forced the institutions to act fast. Institutions selected their platforms. Lecturers changed the format of the content. Parents created spaces for studying within a few days. Lectures took place through video conferencing sessions. Universities provided lectures by moving seminars to Zoom or Teams. Companies moved their workshops online.
Teachers continued with their lessons, but they came to understand the distinction between emergency remote teaching and the designed online course. Designers provide students with explicit paths through content and sufficient time to practice. They introduce activities and constructive feedback. In the first months of the pandemic, teachers were providing lengthy presentations and a bunch of scattered files. They had no opportunity to experiment with technologies and adapt the content to the needs of students with disabilities.
Students encountered a gap in access. Students sometimes shared one device with siblings or parents. Some had no other option than to use mobile data and an unstable connection. Schools distributed printed worksheets to households that had no appropriate device. Parents provided support and supervision of children alongside work. Adult students combined study with frequent interruptions from work and responsibilities. Teachers gained little understanding through attendance.
Teachers found it difficult to understand the virtual classroom. Teachers missed the misunderstandings and exhaustion behind empty cameras. Some students communicated using only chat boxes, but teachers failed to facilitate learning in such large groups. Schools alleviated some of the pressure by offering devices and support. Teachers maintained the link with parents.
This is what the educators got right in 2020 – designing the course with the understanding that the format would be digital. The teachers used video conferencing and slide presentations to deliver the information. Students need guidance and feedback to convert information into knowledge.
Building Better Learning Systems
Once these early changes had taken place, educators evaluated what had not gone well. Many switched from video timetables to a combination of live sessions and learner-driven courses. Educators made videos explaining the topic and collected materials on platforms. Course leaders defined a routine. Learners got the freedom to choose their pace and schedule.
Educators started investing in a learning management system and technology support. They provided training in using digital tools for teaching purposes. Course designers created courses starting from learning objectives and choosing appropriate activities. Then they chose a tool for each task.
The course teams developed home study and practice plans for the learners. They created discussion and feedback sessions for the learners at home. The educators made use of the data collected through the platform to track participation and non-participation of the learners. They reached out to learners who had stopped accessing the platform and submitting their assignments.
Learners had the opportunity to follow a predictable schedule and receive support in well-defined systems. Educators worked according to common templates and guidelines. Administrators handled the issues with login and device access. Educators could devote more time to answering questions and assessing learners' work.
By 2022, many providers had permanently established digital courses in addition to their campus teaching. Providers got enough experience with testing different approaches on a large scale. They identified valuable practices and excluded actions that did not bring learning gains to learners. Providers hired course designers and considered digital education a permanent part of their work.
New Content Formats
After 2020, teams redesigned the online content. Lecturers replaced lengthy recordings with short content and activities. The four formats received more attention from the providers. Each format addressed a certain issue in the design:
-
Self-paced courses. Adult learners opted for these courses due to conflicting timetables and their jobs or children. Designers divided the lesson into small modules to be accomplished between work or family responsibilities.
-
Mobile learning. Employees took courses on their phones during their commute and breaks. Course designers adapted layouts to mobile users and minimized file size for those with low bandwidth. Learners could download and study offline.
-
Microlearning. Training specialists delivered short training courses explaining the changes in software or safety measures. The learners practiced only one skill per unit and performed the task before proceeding to the next module. The designer connected units for subjects where deep knowledge was necessary.
-
Cohort-based courses. Some providers created learning cohorts around the same timetable. The learners participated in live workshops and discussed assignments among themselves. The facilitator answered the questions and guided every cohort.
The designers selected the format in accordance with the learning task. The teachers used video to demonstrate the procedure and text to describe the information. The tutors used projects to check whether the learners applied the skill. Learners became more flexible with self-paced and mobile formats. They got more interaction in cohorts. Course teams combined these formats to provide variety for learners.
The Growth of Hybrid Learning
Educational organizations retained their online practices upon reopening their campuses. Lecturers uploaded content to be discussed in class or used by students at home. Students could watch content explanations online and take tests at home.
By using the blended approach, teachers aimed to bridge individual learning and collective activities. The former engaged students with core materials, while class discussions were devoted to case analysis and practical tasks. Students who could not attend class were able to watch recordings and read notes. Adults became more independent about transportation and planning.
Certain institutions allowed remote learners to join classroom activities along with in-class students. Learners joined class from far distances or when sick. Teachers had to divide their attention between the two groups of learners. Remote learners missed classroom discussions and had difficulties participating in activities. They could not draw the teacher’s attention to themselves. Teachers planned a class route and monitored both groups in class.
The course faculty put learning policies for hybrid learning in place. The instructors made their students aware of which sessions would be online and which ones would require classroom attendance. The course administrators gathered all materials, along with their due dates, on one platform.
Teachers managed to create two environments as integral parts of the same course. Educational organizations that used online space as mere file storage created fragmented learning experiences. Course teams synchronized activities of two environments towards the same objectives.
AI Enters Online Education
Instructors and learners started working with generative AI once the tool became available to a general audience late in 2022. Instructors used it to create lesson plans and sample quiz questions. Instructors revised explanations to match various reading levels and produced practice examples. They saved time and reviewed each output before using it.
Students were requesting explanations and help from chatbots. They needed help evaluating draft versions of their documents. Some students practiced communication skills or solved certain problems with the assistance of AI tutors. Some online platforms customized each question depending on the answer provided by the learners.
Educators realized that there were some limitations. AI-based tools produced false facts and fake sources with confident language. Some models demonstrated bias from the training dataset. Instructors and other staff members of the course team employed four preventive measures:
-
Verify outputs: Teachers verify facts and sources before use. They test instructions.
-
Guard data: Employees ensure no personal and institutional data is submitted into public AI systems.
-
Establish policies: Institutions explain acceptable use, copyright obligations, minimum age, and accountability.
-
Retain human oversight: Skilled teachers retain control of learning outcomes and student welfare. They provide feedback.
Teachers experienced difficulties related to assessments due to students' instant essay production and coding. Some instructors redesigned assignments to be based on individual cases or local data. Some asked learners to submit drafts and discuss their decisions during a brief interview. This way, teachers received more information about students' work.
Course teams use AI for specific tasks and leave control of learning outcomes to qualified teachers. Each teacher verifies each AI-produced output.
Assessment and Credentials
Instructors went further than timed quizzes and virtual examinations with online assessments. Webcam proctoring was used for homework examinations in 2020. Privacy issues, room searches, technical problems, and unstable internet connections have been expressed by learners. Some learners lacked a quiet room or a good device. Teachers came up with applied assessment.
Learners developed projects through various stages and documented their skills' performances. Tutors reviewed project drafts using rubrics and provided feedback. Teachers conducted interviews to check whether students were the real authors of their work and to evaluate their choices. Teachers reviewed the learners' communication skills through team activities and monitored learners' progress through portfolios. Teachers gathered additional data throughout the course.
Universities and other education organizations awarded digital badges and micro-credentials. Employees participated in short courses to demonstrate skills rather than complete a course. Students compiled the credentials to show their competence for a job change or an organization's requirements.
Such credentials could be considered reliable when providers mentioned which skill they assessed and what their criteria were. The evidence of learners' identity verification and practical testing. Employers did not trust such credentials if there were only quizzes or attendance.
Before payment, four aspects need to be verified:
-
Know who is issuing the certification.
-
See how the teachers assess the learner’s submission.
-
Confirm whether relevant employers recognize the certification.
-
There must be validation of skills and evaluation evidence.
Changing Learner Expectations
After being exposed to recorded content for several years, learners expected more in the courses. They wanted clear timetables and flexibility of pace. Working adults needed courses to suit their shifting schedules and home life. Students expected lessons to be applicable on laptops and cellphones.
Individuals with disabilities requested that all barriers be removed by the providers. Course teams incorporated captioning and transcripting. Designers provided keyboard navigation and appropriate contrast. Individuals with disabilities were able to use transcripts to learn about tough topics without having to listen to the material. Those with bad internet could still read the text as videos would not play.
The learners expected immediate support whenever they had some technical or academic issues. People with disabilities felt frustrated during delays in obtaining a solution. The providers created help desks and appointed course tutors. The teachers provided response times and information about where to ask questions.
Learners’ participation was monitored through assignment completion and questions. Polls were carried out and documents circulated during the live sessions. The learners did peer discussion and evaluation.
Learners compared courses from various providers before enrolling. This was based on timetable, availability of support, reviews, and refunds. The course providers won the trust of the disabled persons because they gave accurate information and fulfilled their commitments.
Problems That Remain
However, some students enroll in courses but fail to protect their learning time. Some get demotivated when their teachers neglect unfinished homework. Other colleges focus on enrollments while ignoring completion. Teachers use contact and a realistic timetable to engage learners.
Students who do not belong to any group find themselves isolated from both instructors and other learners. Instructors rarely receive answers to generic questions raised in the forums. They create the community by responding to learners' contributions and organizing group tasks. Students require an incentive to talk to other learners.
Some students are burdened with older mobile devices or even rely on shared devices. Others subscribe to high-cost data bundles. The service providers offer learning material with lower bandwidth and flexible deadlines. Learning institutions and employers give learners equipment if funds permit.
Providers supply learners with finished video tutorials where actual teaching is poor, and there is no useful feedback. Students cannot assess the quality of the material until paying for it. It is necessary to develop some standards for assessment and certification by both employers and regulators.
There is a burden of work on instructors because institutions require many additional tasks to be done online. Instructors need funds to prepare for courses and support learners.
Practical Tips for Course Creators
Course designers can take these lessons into account using a systematic design approach:
-
Outline one learning outcome per module. Delete everything that is not being used or assessed.
-
Select a different format for a reason. Use video for demonstrations and text for explanations.
-
Design with mobile devices and slow internet connections in mind. Provide captions and downloadable content.
-
Make the schedule and workload transparent. Reach out to learners if there is no activity.
-
Foster peer collaboration and frequent tutor interaction.
-
Establish response time and a single channel for support. Make learners aware of who will respond to their queries.
-
Apply AI to specific tasks and assess their performance. Safeguard learner data and make the learners aware of your policies.
-
Beta-test the course with learners. Watch for any difficulties they face.
Conclusion
Providers of education have now included online learning as a permanent mode of learning following the crisis in 2020. Teachers use shorter teaching formats and adopt hybrid methods. They also evaluate practical aspects of learning and adopt AI technologies carefully. Learners require flexible time and access to course materials. They require assistance from humans. The course teams will lead the next phase of development.
